The first board does almost all the work. Going from a bare roof to 35 mm of ceiling captures about 86% of every watt you will ever save - and going from 75 mm to 100 mm costs 22% more and buys 1.8% more. We will not quote you a payback, because the two numbers that decide it are yours.
Three findings, and two of them cost us money.
The first board does almost all the work. Going from a bare roof to 35 mm of ceiling captures about 86% of all the heat you will ever save. Everything after that is fighting over the last 14% — and we will show you the arithmetic, using our own price list.
We will not quote you a payback. Not because we cannot, but because the two numbers that decide it are yours: what you burn, and what you pay for it. We give you the kilowatt-hours. You put the rand on them.
And an American R-value is not a South African R-value. They differ by a factor of 5.678, and that mistake is being made in this market every week.
Almost every good article on poultry housing is American, and their R-values are in different units.
The US extension services recommend a broiler-house ceiling of R-21, minimum R-12 (Mississippi State, Kentucky). Those are imperial — hr·ft²·°F/Btu. 1 m²K/W = 5.678 of them.
| US figure | In the SI units SANS uses |
|---|---|
| R-21 (target) | 3.70 m²K/W |
| R-12 (minimum) | 2.11 m²K/W |
Note in passing that SANS 10400-XA asks 3.7 m²K/W of a roof/ceiling. The same number, arrived at independently by a US farm-economics guide and a South African building regulation. It is simply what the physics costs.
If an insulation R-value looks impressively large, divide it by 5.678 and see if it still does.
PolyCool and SuperCool are EPS boards with a facing — vinyl on PolyCool, uPVC on SuperCool — made from 15D fire-retarded EPS. Prices below are from our published price list of 1 May 2026, supply only, excluding VAT, delivery and installation.
λ = 0.038 W/m·K. That is a declared value, not a measured one — see section 6, where we are honest about this.
| Thickness | R (total assembly) | PolyCool, R/m² | SuperCool, R/m² |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 mm | 1.22 | R119.29 | — |
| 50 mm | 1.62 | R147.60 | R190.32 |
| 65 mm | 2.01 | R176.31 | R216.27 |
| 75 mm | 2.27 | R193.59 | R233.59 |
| 80 mm | 2.41 | R202.23 | R242.22 |
| 100 mm | 2.93 | R236.86 | R276.82 |
(R total = board + internal and external surface resistances + a ventilated roof void.)
An honest gap: to reach the US R-21 target (3.70 m²K/W) you need about 129 mm of EPS. Our price list stops at 100 mm, which reaches 2.93. We are not going to pretend otherwise. Whether you should chase 3.70 at all is the next section.
A bare steel roof with no ceiling has a U-value of roughly 6.0 W/m²K. Here is what each thickness takes off it:
| Thickness | U after | W/m²K saved | Supply R/m² | Heat saved per rand spent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35 mm | 0.82 | 5.18 | R119.29 | 43.4 mW per R1/m² |
| 50 mm | 0.62 | 5.38 | R147.60 | 36.5 |
| 65 mm | 0.50 | 5.50 | R176.31 | 31.2 |
| 75 mm | 0.44 | 5.56 | R193.59 | 28.7 |
| 100 mm | 0.34 | 5.66 | R236.86 | 23.9 |
Read the last column. The thinnest board is the most efficient purchase, by a wide margin, and every millimetre after it buys less.
Put sharply: going from 75 mm to 100 mm costs 22% more and buys 1.8% more heat saving.
That is because the first 35 mm already collapses the U-value from 6.0 to 0.82 — about 86% of every watt you will ever save. The rest is a fight over the remainder.
So why do the Americans say R-21? Because they have long, hard winters and far more heating hours than we do. The colder and longer your heating season, the further up that table it pays to climb. On the Highveld the economic optimum is probably thinner than the American advice, and in a warm region thinner still. Do the sum for your own site — the next section shows you how.
Where thicker genuinely does earn its money: if your real problem is summer heat stress, not winter heating — which in much of South Africa it is — this table is the wrong one to read from. Heat rejection, condensation control and damping the daily swing all reward a thicker board, and none of them appear in a winter-gas calculation.
Different farms burn different things — gas, coal, biomass, electricity — at different prices, with different burner efficiencies. So we will not produce a rand figure. We will produce the heat, which is physics, and you will put the price on it.
Heat saved (kWh/yr) = ΔU × ceiling area × ΔT × heating hours ÷ 1000
Worked, for a 1500 m² house with a 75 mm PolyCool ceiling (ΔU = 5.56 W/m²K):
| Inside − outside (ΔT) | Heating hours/yr | kWh saved/yr |
|---|---|---|
| 10 K | 2 000 | 167 000 |
| 15 K | 2 000 | 250 000 |
| 15 K | 3 000 | 375 000 |
| 20 K | 3 000 | 500 000 |
Now convert with your own fuel:
| Fuel | Energy content | Your cost per useful kWh |
|---|---|---|
| LPG | ~12.8 kWh/kg | (your R/kg) ÷ 12.8 ÷ burner efficiency |
| Coal | ~8.1 kWh/kg | (your R/kg) ÷ 8.1 ÷ boiler efficiency |
| Biomass | ~4–5 kWh/kg | (your R/kg) ÷ 4.5 ÷ efficiency |
| Electricity | 1 kWh/kWh | your tariff, directly |
Against: 1500 m² × R193.59 = R290 385 supply only. Add VAT, delivery, and installation — the price list is a supply rate, and installation is a separate quote you must get.
Insulation cannot save more energy than you actually burn. Take your fuel invoices for a winter cycle. That is the entire prize. If a saving is quoted to you that exceeds your fuel bill, the arithmetic is impossible and you can stop listening.
We make EPS. Two things we will not pretend about.
We hold no thermal-conductivity (λ) test for any of our products. The 0.038 W/m·K used throughout this article is the value tabulated for the EPS class — declared, not measured on our material. We are commissioning the test. Until it is done, treat every R-value we publish as a declared value — and treat every competitor's the same way, unless they can hand you the report.
The claim that insulation improves FCR is weakly evidenced. Vendors quote dramatic feed-conversion gains. We could not find a controlled study isolating insulation from everything else that changed at the same time. The mechanism is sound — a bird held closer to its thermoneutral zone spends less feed staying warm — but we will not put a number on it that we cannot defend. The energy saving is real, calculable, and yours to verify against your own invoices. Treat any FCR benefit as an unpriced bonus.
Mississippi State Extension · University of Kentucky · University of Maryland Extension · The Poultry Site · Technopol price list, 1 May 2026 (supply only, ex VAT).
Prices ex VAT, ex delivery, ex installation, current at 1 May 2026. Every assumption above is one you should replace with your own — that is the entire point of the article.
If a figure in this article does not match your own, yours is probably right. Send us the drawings and we will size it, detail it and quote it.
Request a spec or quote More insightsWe release technical documentation to named engineers and specifiers so we can support you properly on the project. One entry unlocks everything.
We will not share your details. POPIA compliant.