House Coetzer, number 1976 at Eye of Africa Estate, is a double-storey flat-roofed house of the unforgiving kind: long uninterrupted wall planes, deep charcoal parapet and fascia bands, big aluminium-framed glazing, and external corners that turn at a hard arris with nothing to hide behind. There is no eaves shadow, no coursing, no relief. The wall is one flat field bounded by a straight line, and raking sun crosses it every morning. Technopol supplied and applied a Terraco EIFS facade: EPS insulation board fixed to the structure — bonded and mechanically dowelled, both, not one or the other, per Technopol's record of the job; the dowels are in the photographs below, the adhesive bed is not — then a polymer-modified basecoat with alkali-resistant glass-fibre mesh embedded in it, then the decorative topcoat. The basecoat and the mesh are plainly there in the frames. Nothing in the album names either product, so neither is named here. The one product record kept on the job is a Terraco sample card, ref. TC 0146F, issued 18 September 2017: Product "TTC Excel Sil 2mm clear", Colour "TX 138-6 [+ 1 gram B7-SO]", signed and dated at the foot. That card is the last photograph below. Its "Accepted:" line was left blank, so what it carries is a signed product-and-colour record and not an approval — and that record is still the reason the finish on this building is traceable to a card rather than to a screen. It covers one colour; the elevations carry two, the pale field and the charcoal bands. The render carries no thermal duty. Every R-value in this wall belongs to the board behind it; the coating's job is narrower and, on a house like this, harder. It has to be the weather barrier — the product is declared at W24 below 0.15 kg/m²·h^0.5 for liquid-water uptake while staying vapour-open at Sd below 0.10 m — it has to stay stuck, at a declared pull-off bond above 2.0 N/mm², and it has to be the finished surface: no paint job afterwards to bail it out. Those three numbers are product declarations. Nothing on this facade was tested for any of them. What the site record shows is how the system was built at the awkward places. The mesh is visible in the basecoat where the topcoat stops at the parapet cap, and the render is carried over the top of the parapet and down its face as one skin, turned at a square arris sharp enough to throw a hard shadow. The boards are dowelled through with their heads countersunk into shallow recesses in the board face, set to be buried by the basecoat. And across a full two-storey elevation in flat overhead sun, neither the board joints nor the dowel heads telegraph through the finished plane — which is the only test of this system that a photograph can actually settle. The frame at the top of the page is the same house from the driveway with the sun low behind the trees, and at that distance it will not settle anything.
Ours, taken on the job. Not renders.
PHOTO
PHOTO
PHOTOSend us the section and we will tell you what fits.
Talk to someone technical More projectsWe release technical documentation to named engineers and specifiers so we can support you properly on the project. One entry unlocks everything.
We will email you this document, and we may follow up about it. We will not add you to anything else unless you tick the box. We do not share or sell your details. How we handle your information.